Electricity Deregulation
In 18 states (plus DC), consumers can choose who supplies their electricity. Over 20 million homes and 3.8 million businesses have switched to an alternative, competitive retail energy provider (REP).
- 19 jurisdictions (18 states + D.C.) offer retail electricity choice
- Texas leads at 87% — the only mandatory-choice market in the U.S.
- 20M+ homes and 3.8M+ businesses have switched to a competitive supplier
- C&I switching rates exceed residential rates in every deregulated state
- Michigan's 10% cap is fully subscribed with 5,100+ on the waitlist
- Active shoppers save 10–20% on the supply portion of their bill
Map of Deregulated Electricity Markets
Hover over any state to see deregulation status and switching data. Click a deregulated state to jump to its row in the table below.
Market Status
State-by-State Deregulation Data
Click any column header to sort. Data estimates based on utility filings, regulatory reports, and EIA Form 861.
| State | Access | Year | Res. Rate | C&I Rate | Res. Switched | C&I Switched | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residential & Commercial Choice Available | |||||||
| Texas | Res C&I | 2002 | 87% | 87% | 10.5M | 1.65M | Mandatory-choice in ERCOT; 100+ retail providers; largest U.S. competitive market |
| Ohio | Res C&I | 1999 | 57% | 65% | 2.6M | 415K | Government aggregation drives switching; 70+ PUCO-certified CRES providers |
| Pennsylvania | Res C&I | 1997 | 35% | 50% | 1.95M | 310K | 50+ licensed suppliers; PA Power Switch comparison; PECO, PPL, Duquesne territories |
| Illinois | Res C&I | 1997 | 33% | 58% | 1.65M | 340K | Municipal aggregation in ComEd and Ameren territories; ICC oversight |
| New Hampshire | Res C&I | 1996 | 28% | 50% | 155K | 38K | First state to pass restructuring legislation (HB 1392) |
| Massachusetts | Res C&I | 1998 | 22% | 40% | 600K | 185K | Municipal aggregation expanding; National Grid and Eversource territories |
| Rhode Island | Res C&I | 1997 | 20% | 40% | 85K | 26K | Rhode Island Energy territory (formerly Narragansett Electric) |
| Connecticut | Res C&I | 1998 | 17% | 38% | 260K | 55K | Eversource ~17.1% and United Illuminating ~17.0% residential switching (CT OCC, Jan 2025) |
| Maryland | Res C&I | 1999 | 16% | 30% | 370K | 72K | BGE, Pepco, and Delmarva Power territories; PJM market |
| New Jersey | Res C&I | 1999 | 16% | 35% | 580K | 240K | All major utility territories open to competition; PJM market |
| New York | Res C&I | 1996 | 15% | 38% | 1.1M | 390K | ESCO market under active PSC oversight; 100+ CCA communities; restrictions on residential ESCOs |
| Washington D.C. | Res C&I | 2001 | 14% | 48% | 42K | 11K | Pepco territory; active commercial market in PJM |
| Maine | Res C&I | 2000 | 14% | 30% | 95K | 42K | Utilities fully divested generation; standard offer competitively bid; CMP and Versant |
| Delaware | Res C&I | 1999 | 8% | 22% | 30K | 18K | Delmarva Power territory; lower residential participation than neighboring PJM states |
| Limited, Capped, or C&I-Only Markets | |||||||
| Michigan | Capped 10% | 2000 | <1% | ~10% | <500 | 5,517 | 10% cap fully subscribed; 5,100+ on waitlist; 20+ licensed AES (MPSC, 2025) |
| Oregon | C&I Only | 2002 | N/A | ~20% | — | ~30K | No residential choice; PGE and Pacific Power; structured annual enrollment windows |
| California | C&I DA | 1998 | Suspended | Capped | — | Waitlisted | Res. DA suspended since 2001; C&I cap ~28,800 GWh; 25+ CCAs operate separately under different rules |
| Virginia | Limited | 1999 | <1% | <3% | ~5K | ~12K | 100% renewable exception closed 2020; only >5 MW customers eligible; Dominion carbon-free tariff available |
| Nevada | C&I Only | 2001 | N/A | Limited | — | N/A | Application-based for large C&I only; NV Energy territory; exit fees apply |
What Is Electricity Deregulation?
Deregulation separates the electricity supply from the delivery infrastructure. The utility keeps the wires, but competing companies can sell electricity over them. You still get one bill — only the supply portion changes.
How Does Switching Work?
In most deregulated states, switching takes minutes and causes no service interruption:
In states with municipal aggregation (Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts), customers may be enrolled automatically through an opt-out community program.
Does Deregulation Save Money?
Deregulation doesn't guarantee lower prices, but it introduces competition — which historically drives down supply costs in active markets. Commercial and industrial customers tend to benefit most because they consume enough electricity to negotiate favorable contracts. Residential customers who actively compare and switch plans can save 10–20% on the supply portion of their bill, though passive customers who remain on default rates may see little difference.
The key factor is engagement. In Texas, where shopping is essentially mandatory, the competitive market has kept supply rates below the national average for most of the past decade. In Ohio, government aggregation programs have driven residential switching to 57%, creating a competitive environment where suppliers must offer value to retain customers. In states with low switching rates, fewer suppliers compete and the savings potential is more modest.
Why Some States Have Restricted Markets
Not every state that passed deregulation legislation followed through with full implementation. Several markets were scaled back or restricted after initial problems:
- California suspended residential direct access in 2001 after the energy crisis caused by market manipulation and supply shortages. Commercial and industrial customers can participate, but under a cap (~28,800 GWh statewide) with a long waitlist. Separately, 25+ Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) programs now serve millions of California customers, but these operate under different regulatory rules than traditional retail choice.
- Michigan passed its Customer Choice and Electricity Reliability Act in 2000 but capped competitive supply at 10% of each utility's retail sales in 2008 (PA 286). The program has been fully subscribed since 2009, with 5,517 participants (nearly all C&I) and 5,100+ customers on the waitlist as of 2025.
- Virginia allowed switching through a 100% renewable energy exception, but the SCC approved Dominion's own renewable tariff in 2020, effectively closing the loophole. Only customers with demand exceeding 5 MW can access competitive supply today.
- Oregon and Nevada limit choice to commercial and industrial customers, with Oregon using structured annual enrollment windows through PGE and Pacific Power.
Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)
CCA programs deserve special mention because they represent a growing form of electricity choice that doesn't fit neatly into the "deregulated vs. regulated" framework. Under CCA, a local government aggregates the buying power of residents and businesses to procure electricity supply — often with higher renewable energy content — from competitive providers.
CCA is active in California (25+ programs serving ~66,000 GWh of annual load), New York (100+ communities, ~352,000 customer accounts), Massachusetts, Illinois, Ohio, and several other states. In Ohio and Illinois, these programs are the primary driver of residential switching, automatically enrolling customers on an opt-out basis. CCA customers keep their existing utility for delivery and billing — only the supply source changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does electricity deregulation mean?
Electricity deregulation means the state allows consumers to choose their electricity supplier instead of being limited to the local utility monopoly. The utility still delivers the power over its wires, but you pick the company that generates or procures the electricity and sets the supply rate on your bill.
How many states have deregulated electricity?
18 states plus Washington D.C. have some form of retail electricity choice — 19 jurisdictions in total. However, the degree of access varies widely. Texas has a fully competitive mandatory-choice market with 87% switching. Ohio's government aggregation programs have pushed residential switching to 57%. On the other end, Michigan caps participation at 10% of retail sales, Virginia has largely closed its competitive market to new switching, and California suspended residential direct access entirely in 2001.
Does deregulation lower electricity prices?
Deregulation introduces competition, which can lower prices — especially for commercial and industrial customers who actively shop and negotiate. Residential savings depend on engagement: customers who compare and switch plans typically pay 10–20% less on the supply portion of their bill. In Texas, the competitive market has kept supply rates below the national average for much of the past decade. In Ohio, aggregation programs have created strong competitive pressure on suppliers. However, passive customers who stay on default utility rates may see little difference.
Can I choose my electricity provider?
If your state is deregulated and your area is served by a participating utility, yes. Enter your ZIP code on ElectricChoice to see available plans and providers. Some states only allow commercial and industrial customers to choose (Oregon, California, Nevada). Michigan imposes a 10% cap that's fully subscribed with a long waitlist. Virginia has largely closed its competitive market — only customers with demand exceeding 5 MW are eligible.
Will I lose power when I switch providers?
No. Switching electricity suppliers does not cause any interruption in service. The local utility continues to deliver power over the same wires. The only thing that changes is the supply portion of your bill — it comes from your chosen provider instead of the utility's default supply. The transition typically takes 1–2 billing cycles.
What is a switching rate?
The switching rate is the percentage of eligible customers in a deregulated market who have moved from their utility's default supply to a competitive retail provider. A higher switching rate generally indicates a more active and competitive market. Texas leads with 87% (mandatory-choice market), Ohio follows at 57% (driven by government aggregation), and Pennsylvania is at 35%. States with low switching rates may have fewer supplier options, less consumer awareness, or regulatory barriers that limit participation.
Data Sources & Methodology
This page compiles data from EIA Form 861, state public utility commission reports and filings, ISO/RTO market reports, utility-published shopping statistics (PA OCA, CT OCC, PUCO, MPSC), and industry analysis. Estimates are used where official statewide switching counts aren't published as a single figure. Customer counts include both individual ESCO/CRES enrollments and municipal/government aggregation participants. CCA participants are counted separately where noted. Last verified March 2026.